The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (the “OBBBA“), passed by the U.S. House of Representatives (the “House“) on May 22, 2025, is a comprehensive legislative package that seeks to implement sweeping reforms in tax policy, immigration, healthcare, and infrastructure as part of the federal budget reconciliation process. Among other things, the OBBBA would significantly enhance the Section 199A deduction under the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code“) for individuals and other noncorporate taxpayers by extending its applicability to certain dividends issued by qualifying business development companies, or “BDCs.” Specifically, the OBBBA provides for a 23% deduction for recipients of “qualified BDC interest dividends,”[1] expanding the scope and rate of the current deduction available for qualified REIT dividends.

Key Tax Benefit

The OBBBA, as passed by the House, provides for a 23% deduction under Section 199A of the Code for individuals and other noncorporate taxpayers (e.g., trusts and estates) that receive qualified BDC interest dividends (the “Proposed Deduction“). A qualified BDC interest dividend is any dividend from an electing BDC[2] received during the taxable year that is attributable to net interest income of the BDC that is properly allocable to a “qualified trade or business” of the BDC. Given that most existing BDCs tend to engage in loan origination activities, we believe that investors in many existing BDCs could potentially benefit from the Proposed Deduction, assuming that it remains included in the final version of the OBBBA that becomes law. 

In particular, the Proposed Deduction would effectively reduce the 37% highest marginal rate (40.8% taking into account the net investment income tax) to 28.49% (32.29% taking into account the net investment income tax), a reduction of 8.51%. The 8.51% reduction corresponds to an increase of 14.375% in the after-tax yield, potentially enhancing the attractiveness of BDC investments for taxable investors compared to other loan fund structures, including both private funds and registered closed-end funds, such as interval funds.

Currently, the Section 199A deduction is only 20% and is available exclusively for “qualified REIT dividends,” thus excluding BDCs from its coverage.

Pass-through Eligibility

The Proposed Deduction would be pass-through eligible, meaning that partners in a partnership that in turn owns an electing BDC may claim the Proposed Deduction on their share of qualified BDC interest dividends. Therefore, the general partner that receives carry from a partnership that owns a BDC could also benefit from the Proposed Deduction, as could investors in a private feeder fund or fund of funds that in turn invests in a BDC.

Potential Implications

The Proposed Deduction, as presently included in the OBBBA, would significantly enhance the potential after-tax returns for individual and noncorporate investors, potentially making BDCs a more attractive vehicle for income-focused portfolios. To the extent the Proposed Deduction remains included in the final version of the OBBBA that becomes law, we would expect a renewed focus on BDCs, including private BDCs, to maximize the tax efficiencies that could be gained by taking advantage of the Proposed Deduction. To that end, asset management platforms with existing BDCs may wish to evaluate the positive benefits of the Proposed Deduction on their existing BDC vehicles. Similarly, asset managers with registered closed-end funds that invest in credit instruments may want to explore the viability and potential benefits of conversion to a BDC structure, to the extent the nature and type of underlying investments would fit within the requirements for the Proposed Deduction. In addition, going forward, private credit managers may want to consider the viability and benefits of incorporating a BDC within future private credit fund structures as a means of maximizing tax efficiencies for certain types of investors. Finally, feeder funds and fund of funds that invest in BDCs should assess how the deduction can be passed through to partners and investors, including general partners receiving carried interest.

OBBBA Status

While the OBBBA has passed in the House, a corresponding version remains under discussion in the U.S. Senate (the “Senate“), and the final version of the Senate bill, including whether it will contain the Proposed Deduction, currently remains uncertain. Once the Senate has approved its own version of the OBBBA, the bill will be subject to the Congressional reconciliation process, where further revisions could be made to the OBBBA before it ultimately is approved in final form by both the House and Senate and is signed into law by the President. While there is significant pressure on the Senate to pass its own version of the OBBBA, if the Proposed Deduction is omitted from the Senate version, it is less likely to be included in the final version of the OBBBA given the necessary reconciliation process between the House and Senate versions of the OBBBA. Conversely, if it remains in the version of the bill that ultimately passes the Senate, there is a greater likelihood of the Proposed Deduction surviving and becoming part of the final version of the OBBBA. In either case, the omnibus nature of the OBBBA and the number of topics it attempts to address necessarily make any predictions on its timing, including whether or even if a final version will pass, challenging.    

Takeaways

  • The OBBBA, if passed into law in its current form, would increase the Section 199A deduction from 20% to 23% for qualifying investment income, and extend the deduction to qualified BDC interest dividends.
  • For top-bracket taxpayers, the Proposed Deduction reduces the effective tax rate on qualifying BDC interest income from 40.8% to 32.29%, an 8.51% reduction.
  • The tax cut translates to a 14.375% increase in after-tax yield, making BDCs more attractive to taxable investors.
  • Only net interest income from a BDC’s qualified trade or business (e.g., lending) qualifies for purposes of the Proposed Deduction, meaning that direct lending BDCs will likely see a greater benefit from the Proposed Deduction.
  • To qualify, the BDC must be an “electing BDC” (i.e., a BDC regulated under the Investment Company Act of 1940 that elects RIC treatment under Section 851 of the Code).
  • The benefit of the Proposed Deduction can be passed through to partners in partnerships that in turn own BDCs, including general partners receiving carried interest and investors in private feeder funds and fund of funds.
  • This change better aligns BDCs with REITs, which already benefit from the 199A deduction, potentially leveling the playing field for income-focused investment vehicles.
  • Fund managers, tax advisors, and investors should evaluate how to structure ownership and distributions to maximize eligibility for the deduction.

[1]Qualified BDC interest dividend” is any dividend from an electing business development company (“BDC“) received during the taxable year that is attributable to net interest income of the BDC that is properly allocable to a “qualified trade or business” of the BDC. Accordingly, only net interest income of a BDC qualifies for the deduction. We believe that lending is a qualified trade or business for this purpose.

[2] An “electing BDC” is a “business development company” (as defined in section 2(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940) that has an election in effect under Section 851 of the Code to be treated as a regulated investment company (“RIC“).

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of John Mahon John Mahon

John Mahon is a partner in the Registered Funds group and a member of the Investment Management practice. John has nearly 20 years of experience working with asset management clients in structuring, launching and managing regulated fund products and other permanent capital vehicles.…

John Mahon is a partner in the Registered Funds group and a member of the Investment Management practice. John has nearly 20 years of experience working with asset management clients in structuring, launching and managing regulated fund products and other permanent capital vehicles.

He represents private equity firms, credit managers and other financial sector participants in a wide range of fund formation, capital markets and securities law matters, including both public and private offerings of business development companies (BDCs) and other alternative vehicles, such as registered closed-end funds and interval funds.

John also has extensive experience in advising asset managers on the unique regulatory complexities involved in launching and managing registered funds and BDCs, including as part of larger platforms, and has sought and obtained SEC exemptive relief on behalf of numerous clients. He has been involved with more than 100 debt and equity offerings, including over 20 initial public offerings (IPOs), reflecting an aggregate of over $10 billion in total proceeds.

John’s work in securities law and mergers and acquisitions includes providing guidance to many New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and Nasdaq-listed companies in connection with ongoing corporate governance and SEC reporting and compliance matters. He has routinely handled issues involving tender offers, proxy solicitations, going-private transactions, and beneficial ownership reporting obligations.

John previously worked in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance, where he earned the SEC Capital Markets Award.

He is a prominent and engaged member of the investment management community. He has spoken and written on topics ranging from SEC regulations and disclosure obligations to public and private capital raising structures, 1940 Act regulated funds and M&A issues.

John has served as an adjunct professor at the George Washington University Law School since 2009, and at the Georgetown University Law Center since 2023. He also formerly served as the chair of the Corporate Finance Committee of the Corporation, Finance and Securities Law Section of the District of Columbia Bar.

Photo of David S. Miller David S. Miller

David Miller is a partner in the Tax Department. David advises clients on a broad range of domestic and international corporate tax issues. His practice covers the taxation of financial instruments and derivatives, private and public REITs, cross-border lending transactions and other financings…

David Miller is a partner in the Tax Department. David advises clients on a broad range of domestic and international corporate tax issues. His practice covers the taxation of financial instruments and derivatives, private and public REITs, cross-border lending transactions and other financings, international and domestic mergers and acquisitions, multinational corporate groups and partnerships, private equity and hedge funds, bankruptcy and workouts, high-net-worth individuals and families, and public charities and private foundations. He advises companies in virtually all major industries, including banking, finance, private equity, health care, life sciences, real estate, technology, consumer products, entertainment and energy.

David is strongly committed to pro bono service, and has represented more than 500 charities. In 2011, he was named as one of thirteen “Lawyers Who Lead by Example” by the New York Law Journal for his pro bono service. David has also been recognized for his pro bono work by The Legal Aid Society, Legal Services for New York City and New York Lawyers For The Public Interest.

David has been consistently recognized by leading industry publications, such as Chambers Global, Chambers USA, Best Lawyers and The Legal 500. Clients surveyed by Chambers USA said, “We bring him in on complex matters because he has the experience and the gravitas.” David is one of 17 lawyers in the United States in The Legal 500’s Hall of Fame for US Tax (non-contentious).

David has taught the taxation of financial instruments at Columbia Law School, and tax policy at New York University School of Law. He is also a frequent author and has written a number of articles and chapters in various tax publications. David is the former chair of the tax section of the New York State Bar Association.

Prior to joining Proskauer, David was a partner at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP.

Photo of Martin T. Hamilton Martin T. Hamilton

Martin T. Hamilton is a partner in the Tax Department. He primarily handles U.S. corporate, partnership and international tax matters.

Martin’s practice focuses on mergers and acquisitions, cross-border investments and structured financing arrangements, as well as tax-efficient corporate financing techniques and the tax…

Martin T. Hamilton is a partner in the Tax Department. He primarily handles U.S. corporate, partnership and international tax matters.

Martin’s practice focuses on mergers and acquisitions, cross-border investments and structured financing arrangements, as well as tax-efficient corporate financing techniques and the tax treatment of complex financial products. He has experience with public and private cross-border mergers, acquisitions, offerings and financings, and has advised both U.S. and international clients, including private equity funds, commercial and investment banks, insurance companies and multinational industrials, on the U.S. tax impact of these global transactions.

In addition, Martin has worked on transactions in the financial services, technology, insurance, real estate, health care, energy, natural resources and industrial sectors, and these transactions have involved inbound and outbound investment throughout Europe and North America, as well as major markets in East and South Asia, South America and Australia.

Martin also regularly represents clients in tax controversies and other matters before the U.S. tax authorities.

Photo of Martine Seiden Agatston Martine Seiden Agatston

Martine Seiden Agatston is a senior counsel in the Tax Department in the Los Angeles office. Her practice focuses on general tax matters, including domestic and international transactions. Representative matters have included U.S. and cross-border financings, debt and equity capital markets transactions, complex…

Martine Seiden Agatston is a senior counsel in the Tax Department in the Los Angeles office. Her practice focuses on general tax matters, including domestic and international transactions. Representative matters have included U.S. and cross-border financings, debt and equity capital markets transactions, complex mergers and acquisitions and corporate restructurings, as well as representation before the tax authorities. She also has acted for REITs, RICs (including BDCs) and other regulated investment entities on transactional matters.

Photo of Caroline Spillane Caroline Spillane

Caroline Spillane is an associate in the Corporate Department and is a member of the Registered Funds Group.

Shaina Maldonado

Shaina L. Maldonado is an associate in the Corporate Department and a member of
the Registered Funds Group