On August 12, 2026, in K Alain, L.L.L.P. v. Commissioner,[1] the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit withdrew its taxpayer-friendly January 16, 2026 opinion in Sirius Solutions, L.L.L.P. v. Commissioner,[2] and replaced it with a decision that is ambiguous in its application but appears
Partnership Taxation
Securities Transfer Tax: a welcome simplification for LP secondary transactions?
By Richard Miller, Daniella Abel & David M. Ward on
The UK government has published draft legislation for a new Securities Transfer Tax (STT), which is expected to replace the existing stamp duty and stamp duty reserve tax (SDRT) regimes for transfers of securities.
The proposal is intended to modernise and simplify the UK’s stamp taxes on shares regime by…
BlueCrest: UK Supreme Court clarifies “significant influence” under the LLP salaried members rules
By Charlotte Ahamed, Richard Miller & Robert E. Gaut on
The Supreme Court has handed down its judgment in HMRC v BlueCrest Capital Management (UK) LLP, dismissing BlueCrest’s appeal and providing important clarification on the application of the salaried members rules to investment management LLPs.
The decision is particularly significant for asset managers, hedge fund managers and other investment…
Tax Court Rejects Due Process Challenge to BBA Audit Regime in Jones Bluff
On March 19, 2026, in Jones Bluff, LLC v. Commissioner, 166 T.C. No. 6 (2026), the Tax Court held that a partnership could not assert due process claims to invalidate an IRS adjustment on behalf of its partners under the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (the “BBA”) regime. The…
Fifth Circuit in Sirius Solutions Reverses Tax Court and Exempts Limited Partners from Self-Employment Tax
On January 16, 2026, in Sirius Solutions, L.L.L.P. v. Commissioner,[1] No. 24-60240 (5th Cir. Jan. 16, 2026), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed the Tax Court and held that, for self-employment tax purposes, a “limited partner” means “a partner in a limited partnership that…
Treasury and the IRS Release Final and Proposed Regulations on Section 892
I. Introduction
On December 15, 2025, the U.S. Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) and the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) published final regulations (the “Final Regulations”) and proposed regulations (the “Proposed Regulations”) under section 892.[1] The Final Regulations finalize, with modifications…
The Tax Court in Soroban Holds that Limited Partners Were Too Active To Be Treated As “Limited Partners” and are Subject to Self-Employment Tax
On May 28, 2025, in Soroban Capital Partners LP v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo 2025-52) (“Soroban II”), the Tax Court held the active role of limited partners in a fund manager caused them to fail to qualify as “limited partners” for purposes of section 1402(a)(13) and, therefore, the limited…
IRS and Treasury Announce Withdrawal of Related Party Basis Shifting Regulations
On April 17, 2025, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) issued Notice 2025-23 (the “Notice”), announcing its intention to withdraw the recently released final regulations final regulationsthat classify certain partnership related party basis shifting transactions and substantially similar transactions as “transactions of interest”. The Notice provides taxpayers and their…
Final Regulations Issued for Certain Partnership Related Party Basis Adjustment Transactions
Introduction
On January 10, 2025, the Treasury Department and the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) released final regulations (the “regulations”) classifying certain partnership related party basis adjustment transactions and substantially similar transactions as transactions of interest, a type of reportable transaction, which requires disclosure for the taxpayer and its…
Tax Court Reaffirmed Soroban’s Holding that Active Limited Partners of State Law Limited Partnerships May Be Subject to Self-Employment Tax
On December 23, 2024, in Denham Capital Management LP v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2024-114), the Tax Court reaffirmed its earlier ruling in Soroban Capital Partners LP v. Commissioner (161 T.C. No. 12.) that active limited partners of a state law limited partnership are not entitled to the “limited partner exception”…